Catalyst Browse 2.2

megabit wrote on 4/9/2016, 2:49 AM
Only a few weeks ago did we complain about secondary monitor not available in the Catalyst suite - and voila! - it's here, at least in the free Browse interface (my other paid apps trials expired, but I assume they have it, too).

But is it just my system, or have verone noticed that - even with the secondary monitor disabled - the playback performance of Browse is much worse than in its previous build? Not only is it choppy (more like... Vegas), but what's worse: after using it for several minutes it stops responding gradually, and at some point - with CPU usage still raising - it kills Windows Explorer.

Again: is it just me, or have you noticed it too?

Piotr

AMD TR 2990WX CPU | MSI X399 CARBON AC | 64GB RAM@XMP2933  | 2x RTX 2080Ti GPU | 4x 3TB WD Black RAID0 media drive | 3x 1TB NVMe RAID0 cache drive | SSD SATA system drive | AX1600i PSU | Decklink 12G Extreme | Samsung UHD reference monitor (calibrated)

Comments

monoparadox wrote on 4/11/2016, 1:50 PM
Piotr,

I'm not noticing much difference as far as performance in Browse versions. I have a licensed version of Catalyst Prepare and it hasn't been updated with the secondary monitor feature, yet. Looking forward to it. It's definitely a step forward in Browse.

-- tom