I saved a lot of picture off of the internet to my hard drive and imported them into my project.
I got to wondering how they would look on a wide screen so I burned a blu ray of a bunch of them and played them back.
Interesting in that some looked lousy and some looked great.
So I checked the properties and of course found out the lousy ones were low pixels.
Of course low pixels looking bad is not a surprise but just how depending on the pictures I saved some had high pixel counts and some low.
What determines the pixel count?
I saved them all the same way into Microsoft Picture Manager and I think that it automatically sets them to jpeg? or jpg. There is no option to select a different option as far as I know so I would think that if they are all jpg or all the same format, the pixel count should be the same for all?
But it looks like the pixel rate is determined by the actual source picture?
Somewhat confusing.
So the ones that looked lousy when saved and then rendered, I started to just take footage of them w my camcorder right off of my computer screen, that way they are 1440 by 1080? I guess if you take footage w a camcorder the quality is whatever the camcorder is set to.
I.e. number or pixels/quality is determined by the camcorder settings not the source picture being filmed? (Ok I know it's not film but I like that term anyways, makes me feel like I'm a big time movie studio head),
I got to wondering how they would look on a wide screen so I burned a blu ray of a bunch of them and played them back.
Interesting in that some looked lousy and some looked great.
So I checked the properties and of course found out the lousy ones were low pixels.
Of course low pixels looking bad is not a surprise but just how depending on the pictures I saved some had high pixel counts and some low.
What determines the pixel count?
I saved them all the same way into Microsoft Picture Manager and I think that it automatically sets them to jpeg? or jpg. There is no option to select a different option as far as I know so I would think that if they are all jpg or all the same format, the pixel count should be the same for all?
But it looks like the pixel rate is determined by the actual source picture?
Somewhat confusing.
So the ones that looked lousy when saved and then rendered, I started to just take footage of them w my camcorder right off of my computer screen, that way they are 1440 by 1080? I guess if you take footage w a camcorder the quality is whatever the camcorder is set to.
I.e. number or pixels/quality is determined by the camcorder settings not the source picture being filmed? (Ok I know it's not film but I like that term anyways, makes me feel like I'm a big time movie studio head),