If I start with a video with these specifications (i.e., Sony FDR AX100 XAVC S Long) …
• 60 Mbps Bit Rate
• 4:2:0 Subsampling
• 8 bit Bit Depth
Then save it as Sony XAVC Intra with these specifications
• 110 Mbps Bit Rate
• 4:2:2 Subsampling
• 10 bit Bit Depth
Isn’t it true that nothing is gained in quality. Specifically, changing from 60 to 110 does nothing, changing subsampling from 4:2:0 to 4:2:0 does nothing, and changing 8 bits to 10 bits doesn’t nothing. Changing codecs can’t improve the quality over what is already have, agree?
There may be some advantages with editing but as far as quality goes, there is nothing to be gained by saving to a different codec, right?
XAVC Intra results in a file 3 to 4 times larger than XACX S Long and I can see no reason to save to the Intra codec, can you?
Rich
• 60 Mbps Bit Rate
• 4:2:0 Subsampling
• 8 bit Bit Depth
Then save it as Sony XAVC Intra with these specifications
• 110 Mbps Bit Rate
• 4:2:2 Subsampling
• 10 bit Bit Depth
Isn’t it true that nothing is gained in quality. Specifically, changing from 60 to 110 does nothing, changing subsampling from 4:2:0 to 4:2:0 does nothing, and changing 8 bits to 10 bits doesn’t nothing. Changing codecs can’t improve the quality over what is already have, agree?
There may be some advantages with editing but as far as quality goes, there is nothing to be gained by saving to a different codec, right?
XAVC Intra results in a file 3 to 4 times larger than XACX S Long and I can see no reason to save to the Intra codec, can you?
Rich