Subject:Acid files
Posted by: ccooper
Date:2/27/1999 6:40:37 PM
I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a wave it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying to get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a formula or something to get the exact # of beats every time? |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: Lynchmob
Date:3/1/1999 6:40:59 PM
Chris Cooper wrote: >>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a wave >>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying to >>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every time? > I have the same problem, Please E-mail me with the solution if you get one, celynch@texas.net |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: SonicAcidMan
Date:3/3/1999 5:55:21 PM
Hi guys, hope I can help. These must be loops that aren't ACIDized (do not have any length or key information in a special ACID section of the WAV file). Or it is possible that the editor is blowing away this "ACIDize" info from the file. Basically when ACID reloads the file, it guesses wrong at the number of beats in the file. Without a file being ACIDized ACID will usually guess correctly on loops that are in 4/4 time, are 75-150 BPM and are 1,2,4,8,16 or 32 measures long. OK enough background - on to the fixes.... The quick fix: To fix a file that plays back too fast double the number in the "Number of beats" setting on the "Track Properties" tab. To fix a file that plays back too slow halve the number in the "Number of beats" setting on the "Track Properties" tab. Two more long term solutions for files that cause problems: 1. Save the file from ACID before editing it. That will ACIDize (add the length info to the file). Sound Forge 4.5 (and XP 4.5) and most other editors will preserve this extra info in the file. 2. Sound Forge 4.5 (and XP 4.5) both have a ACID Info dialog - you can use this to be sure the length in beats is correct. BTW .. Take a while to mess with the functions on the ACID toolbar in Forge and XP - they give extra loop editing power! 3. Previous versions of Sound Forge / XP do not know about the ACID info in WAV files. When saving if asked to preserve unknown "chunks" say YES - it is probably the ACID info chunk with the length. I agree that having to take these extra steps can suck. The problem is that ACID by design does not mess with (i.e. overwrite) your WAV file until prompted to. Maybe in the next version we can do something better about this... I will put it on the list... Chris Moulios ACID Dev. Lead Chris Cooper wrote: >>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a wave >>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying to >>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every time? >> |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: Tex
Date:7/4/1999 1:06:00 AM
Chris Cooper wrote: >>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a wave >>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying to >>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every time? >> |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: BBILLYK5
Date:3/22/2000 7:57:00 PM
Chris wrote: >>Chris Cooper wrote: >>>>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a >>wave >>>>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>>>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>>>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>>>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>>>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying >>to >>>>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>>>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every >>time? >>> >> >>I have the same problem, Please E-mail me with the solution >>if you get one, celynch@texas.net >> |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: FFire
Date:4/27/2000 11:24:00 AM
uncheck "strech to tempo" box and thats all peace --Lev-- Tony wrote: >> >> >>Chris Cooper wrote: >>>>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a wave >>>>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>>>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>>>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>>>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>>>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying to >>>>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>>>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every time? >>>> |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: scottdoggy
Date:6/3/2000 4:53:00 PM
Chris wrote: >>Chris Cooper wrote: >>>>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a >>wave >>>>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>>>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>>>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>>>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>>>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying >>to >>>>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>>>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every >>time? >>> >> >>I have the same problem, Please E-mail me with the solution >>if you get one, celynch@texas.net >>Well Chris the key thing for anyone creating music with samples is TEMPO, try to make sure the sample you are using is the same tempo as the sequencer, every sequencer will timestrech your sample to match the selected seq tempo, there's not much of a choice to get around it believe me mate, I am a sound engineer that loves mucking about with samples and i suffer the same problem you and many others have, some sequencers do a pretty good job as long as it does'nt have to timestretch it by more that 10-20 bpm......see ya! have fun.....email me some toons and i'll see if i can sort you out!!!!! |
Subject:Re: Acid files
Reply by: scottdoggy
Date:6/3/2000 4:56:00 PM
Chris wrote: >>Chris Cooper wrote: >>>>I have Acid and SoundForge, when I tell Acid to edit a >>wave >>>>it opens up SoundForge to edit the file and I make my >>>>changes just fine. The problem is when the files get back >>>>in acid they are sped up. I know how to fix this by >>>>guessing and editing the number of beats in the file. This >>>>however is very annoying. I spend most of my time trying >>to >>>>get this correct. Is there a way around this or is there a >>>>formula or something to get the exact # of beats every >>time? >>> >> >>I have the same problem, Please E-mail me with the solution >>if you get one, celynch@texas.net >>Well Chris the key thing for anyone creating music with samples is TEMPO, try to make sure the sample you are using is the same tempo as the sequencer, every sequencer will timestrech your sample to match the selected seq tempo, there's not much of a choice to get around it believe me mate, I am a sound engineer that loves mucking about with samples and i suffer the same problem you and many others have, some sequencers do a pretty good job as long as it does'nt have to timestretch it by more that 10-20 bpm......see ya! have fun.....email me some toons and i'll see if i can sort you out!!!!! |
Subject:ignore this
Reply by: Kelly_S
Date:10/3/2000 10:13:00 AM
Test...test. |
Subject:test
Reply by: Kelly_S
Date:10/3/2000 10:17:00 AM
test |
Subject:RE: test
Reply by: riredale
Date:4/10/2014 12:46:18 PM
Don't hate me for wanting to set a new record for "Time interval between posts." |
Subject:RE: test
Reply by: robwood
Date:4/10/2014 5:32:29 PM
the users here are listed as joining in 2000 or 2001 yet the postings are from 1999. Sony had a different website prior to this one and they imported the previous threads? Message last edited on4/10/2014 5:39:23 PM byrobwood. |
Subject:RE: test
Reply by: sodbuster-ca
Date:4/11/2014 4:03:44 PM
"...Sony had a different website prior to this one and they imported the previous threads? Actually, at that time (1999-2000), ACID was still owned by Sonic Foundry. So it appears that Sony acquired Sonic Foundry's Forum database along with other assets. There's a hint of that in the thread: one of those posting calls himself "SonicAcidMan". Message last edited on4/11/2014 4:05:18 PM bysodbuster-ca. |