Comments

paul_w wrote on 4/16/2012, 2:42 PM
Good test, scored 8. (the lower the score the better, zero is perfect).

Paul.
JJKizak wrote on 4/16/2012, 4:13 PM
My Sharp TV monitor 147, my score zero. Just kidding.
JJK
Duncan H wrote on 4/16/2012, 6:12 PM
Thanks for posting this link, I found it surprisingly challenging. Didn't spend a great deal of time on it, scored 8, but interestingly found out my real weakness was in the mauve-magenta spectrum, fine in all others. Thanks.
I'm blaming a standard LG non calibrated monitor - nothing to do with my limitations of course.

Duncan
PeterDuke wrote on 4/16/2012, 7:39 PM
I got 29

I knew it was time I bought a new monitor.
Hulk wrote on 4/16/2012, 7:52 PM
Well I finally found something I have talent for. Got 'em all right a few times in a row.
ushere wrote on 4/16/2012, 9:41 PM
interesting....

64 / score 64. is it age related?
Hulk wrote on 4/16/2012, 10:54 PM
Quality monitor is definitely a factor. I got it 100% right 4 times in a row on my desktop but got 4 wrong on my laptop.
ddm wrote on 4/16/2012, 11:12 PM
Whew, that was pretty hard, got a perfect score, though. what a relief since that's what I do for a living.
JJKizak wrote on 4/17/2012, 6:29 AM
What was the lower block for associated with the top row?
JJK
Rory Cooper wrote on 4/17/2012, 7:39 AM
Can’t be!!! I got 19.

the bottom block for score is light grey so -1 the back is dark grey – another so = 17. I can live with 17.
FilmingPhotoGuy wrote on 4/17/2012, 8:28 AM
I scored a little higher than my age of 53. I must be going blind