Still no time code in Pro10c...embarrassing!

erikd wrote on 3/18/2011, 12:47 AM
How many weeks now has Sony let 10c go without a patch for this most glaring error? Can you imagine if the latest release of Avid, FCP or CS5 didn't have time code available in the media files? Can you imagine how much screaming and flaming would be omni-present on their respective forums?

The simple fact is that you don't hear that much about it on the Vegas forum. Sony's response proves that they know what I hate to admit is true. The vast bulk of the editing world professionals don't consider Vegas a truly PRO NLE software and it is now pretty clear that Sony doesn't really either... or they would have addressed this most basic and quite unbelievable problem immediately. How hard would it have been to release immediately 10d for the sole purpose of trying to appear PRO and at least fixing the time code problem?


Erik

Comments

Grazie wrote on 3/18/2011, 1:20 AM
I ain't no programmer.

There maybe another reason. If they could have just offered a patch, as you are suggesting, im guessing they would have. BUT, as they haven't, this must be so fundamental and so intermeshed with the main program that they are wanting to get it right.

I interpret it this way. Why aren't you?

Grazie

farss wrote on 3/18/2011, 3:54 AM
I can think of nothing to counter the general thrust of your argument.


Bob.
PeterWright wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:06 AM
Yes - I agree. I only use source timecode in occasional projects, and haven't needed it recently, but if I was editing in V10.0c and the need arose to give my client a Camera TC DVD I would be very annoyed that this still hasn't been fixed - the problem was established in early January.
rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:12 AM
I need source timecode a lot so I rolled back to 10.0a and am patiently waiting for 10,0d.
Call me a dreamer but I hope the reason for the delay is that SCS wants to make sure ALL the bugs are DEAD.

Mike
PeterWright wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:19 AM
Mike, they may say you're a dreamer, but you're not the only one (Cheers JL)

Peter
ushere wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:25 AM
i agree totally with mike.... the only good bug is a dead bug.

i regularly use tc dubs to send to clients (do them in 9). it's appalling that it wasn't caught and fixed in 10c.

i think scs is spending way too much time trying to load vegas with features rather than producing a robust, reliable nle that it was and should be.

we all have our moments of doubt and faith, and mine was 10b. 10c isn't doing a lot to restore it. that said, where else to turn for salvation? fcp, avid, edius?
Grazie wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:34 AM
So, is the consensus that, as this is taking time to correct, SCS are attempting to put it right or what?

Grazie

rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 4:36 AM
where else to turn for salvation? fcp, avid, edius?

Alcohol or some good pharmaceuticals :)
Better yet, a month in the place of your choosing with no internet.
+14C. (54 F.) today so it looks like winter is finally over!!

Mike
Grazie wrote on 3/18/2011, 5:30 AM
Nice one Pete! Wonder if everbody got the Lennonism?

Grazie

rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 5:36 AM
I hope someday you'll join us
And the world will live as one.

Mike
farss wrote on 3/18/2011, 7:01 AM
"So, is the consensus that, as this is taking time to correct, SCS are attempting to put it right or what?"

I'm certain they'll get it fixed. I see the issue as the priority assigned to this issue.

1) If you're someone making home movies, shooting events, that kind of work, then TC is nothing to you. Fixing the problem is not a high priority, fix can be rolled up into next update along with other fixes

2) If you're working with other professionals it is life and death. A company that saw its userbase as being signifcantly composed of such people would be working around the clock to fix this one problem.

Erikd's point is that SCS seem to think most of their users fall into category 1) and don't seem overly interested in attracting users from category 2).

Bob.
winrockpost wrote on 3/18/2011, 7:06 AM
Vegas and timecode has always been iffy at best,, never has been able to read prores 422,, while every other ap does...priority with sony ?
Reality leaves a lot to the imagination
Grazie wrote on 3/18/2011, 7:48 AM
As you have used my words, Bob, please do NOT clump me into a category that at the same time wouldn't want this item fixed. And I say this for 2 reasons:

A] I want my colleagues here who DO need it to have it fixed for them - and that IS a priority. My priority is for my chums here to be secure in the knowledge that Vegas IS delivering for them what they want, otherwise I could take a truly selfish attitude about this and say - Tough! But I don't. Why? 'Cos not saying that, is in my mind, BEING professional too.

B] I want to be here WITH other professionals who DO need this to happen. So, ar you saying that those who don't use timecode aren't professional? Interesting.

And Bob, how do you know this to be true, that:-

Erikd's point is that SCS seem to think most of their users fall into category 1) and don't seem overly interested in attracting users from category 2).

Unless you've checked this out with Erikd, outside of this Forum, how would he know this to be the case with SCS either?

No, not until SONY comes here and states, categorically, what you are saying is the case, then what you've posited has to remain pure conjecture.

We can only hope that SCS get this item fixed ASAP.

Grazie

rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 7:56 AM
Vegas and timecode has always been iffy at best,,

As I discovered in the http://www.sonycreativesoftware.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=570562strange time code behaviour[/link] thread :(

Mike
JohnnyRoy wrote on 3/18/2011, 8:31 AM
> "1) If you're someone making home movies, shooting events, that kind of work, then TC is nothing to you. Fixing the problem is not a high priority, fix can be rolled up into next update along with other fixes"

I don't think I've ever used timecode in my 10 years of editing with Vegas. I mostly shoot events. I think a lot of Vegas editors are shooting events. Even when I making a creative spot, I drop my footage on the timeline and get creative. That's what I love about Vegas. It's like working with clay. You just get in there and start moving things around and see what emerges. Timecode just doesn't enter into the workflow.

> "2) If you're working with other professionals it is life and death. A company that saw its userbase as being signifcantly composed of such people would be working around the clock to fix this one problem."

Let's face it, the majority of Vegas editors are probably "lone wolves". We shoot and edit our own stuff. Even those of us who are making feature length films. We may collaborate amongst ourselves, but by and large we are self-sufficient editors. We use Vegas because it is has a more productive workflow than any other NLE's.

"Timecode... we don't need no stinkin' timecode"... ;-) lol

~jr
PeterWright wrote on 3/18/2011, 8:56 AM
I've been a "lone wolf" for 16 years.

For some projects, I need my client to be able to identify which footage contains the best example of something. Now, they could tell me they "liked that shot when he came out of the building", but, if I had given them a Timecode dub, they could say:
01:00:23:18:10 to 01.00.24.17:23
and I would save a lot of time.
rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 8:58 AM
"Timecode... we don't need no stinkin' timecode"... ;-) lol

You need it when the person you shot the video for (i.e. higher up the "food" chain than you are) says "I want to see everything you shot so that I can tell you what I want in the video.
The fact that he/she/they have no experience editing video has nothing to do with the fact that they call the shots :(

Mike
erikd wrote on 3/18/2011, 9:08 AM
Grazie, I certainly respect your posts here on the forum and recognize you to be a professional. However, even though I come close to being a "lone wolf", I still need and use time code every day. Having come from the collaborative post-production world, I can state categorically that if Sony were truly interesting in capturing those who aren't lone wolves, they would have dealt with the time code issue IMMEDIATELY. As in priority uno!

You simply can't exist in the collaborative world without it. But even if you don't need to play well with others and want to go it alone, time code is still critical for those like myself doing doc long-form style editing. We have thousands of hours of transcriptions that are all time code based. We have also thousands of hours of proxy library clips that are all time code based.

It has already been a sorry state of affairs to not have time code in audio for so long but to have it removed from video was a real insult.

No one at Sony noticed when they working on 10c that their clips on their timeline didn't have time code????!!!!!! Really??? It's not on the check list to verify??

Grazie to your other question, since time code has been in Vegas video clips for a very long time, I can't imagine how a simple version update from 10b to 10c (no new features just bug fixes) so fundamentally changed everything in the base code that it is now a major problem to get time code back. What stands out to you logically as an explanation for why 10b has it and 10c doesn't?

Erik
winrockpost wrote on 3/18/2011, 9:56 AM
Without timecode I would be lost,, lone wolf ...really, I don't want to be a lone wolf.. I'd probably starve .I like to have a producer log an outline , create the roughcut story and then I edit.... maybe I'm in the minority.. I hate the producing aspect of my job.. I try to leave that for others... Can't do everything, at least not well I need the stinking timecode... on every project ..
rs170a wrote on 3/18/2011, 10:15 AM
Erik, it was broken in 10.0b, not 10.c which is why I have 10.0a running on my machine.

Mike
erikd wrote on 3/18/2011, 12:17 PM
"Erik, it was broken in 10.0b, not 10.c which is why I have 10.0a running on my machine."

That actually makes it even worse. Really unbelievable that they didn't solve it in 10c.
Yoyodyne wrote on 3/18/2011, 12:30 PM
Thanks for the heads up on the timecode issue.

Since I've been using DSLR so much lately have not used clip timecode in a bit but that is something that should really be working. When you need it you really need it!

I will add this - thank God for Pluraleyes!
Earl_J wrote on 3/18/2011, 12:45 PM
Yes, Grazie ... I did. . . (grin)
erikd wrote on 3/18/2011, 12:46 PM
"Let's face it, the majority of Vegas editors are probably "lone wolves". We shoot and edit our own stuff. Even those of us who are making feature length films. We may collaborate amongst ourselves, but by and large we are self-sufficient editors. We use Vegas because it is has a more productive workflow than any other NLE's."

JR, I agree with all you said. My question is why does it HAVE to be this way. A little collaboration effort by Sony could go a very long way to elevating the status of Vegas and ultimately making a lot more money for Sony. For example,is it really that hard to have EDL list integration with other NLE's?