Subject:SF10: Elastique Pro
Posted by: sean@oregonsound.com
Date:9/20/2009 3:07:27 PM
Can anybody offer opinions on whether the new time stretch plugin is noticeably superior to the old, old, old, old, Sound Forge algorithms which I don't believe had been updated since about version 3? If so, that alone could justify the upgrade from 9 for me. |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: Kennymusicman
Date:9/21/2009 1:39:30 PM
Yes. Get the demo - you'll understand immediately :) |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: sean@oregonsound.com
Date:9/21/2009 11:15:02 PM
Thanks, I'm on it! |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: Weka
Date:10/6/2009 12:51:37 PM
I've just installed SF10 and I'm surprised and impressed by élastique. I don't have Melodyne or any other similar ap so I feel I have my upgrade's worth in this alone. |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: Andreas S.
Date:10/8/2009 9:34:11 AM
Elastique is slick. The interface just makes a lot of sense. I've just used it on a short video project to get the provided music to fit. There was a misunderstanding between the director and the musician who his track was a bit short, but it was glarling and awkward (it cut out early). Elastique to the rescue. So, I've already used it, and am grateful for it. |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: Nick Hope
Date:10/18/2009 6:34:16 AM
I have a load of 25fps video/audio footage that I intend to slow down to 24fps. In other words a 4% slow-down. Do I need to worry about that much slow-down of audio? Will it be detectable? Can I fix it (restore the pitch) adquately with SF9's or Vegas Pro 8's tools? Would the result with Elastique Pro be significantly better? Trying to decide on an upgrade before the end of the special offer at the end of October. I don't use SF much, and this would be the only reason for me to upgrade. |
Subject:RE: SF10: Elastique Pro
Reply by: Kennymusicman
Date:10/18/2009 1:39:03 PM
Get the demo, and try it. Let the results guide you :) |