Subject:preverb?
Posted by: ajp
Date:6/17/1999 12:14:00 PM
hi, I just went to a seminar by sonicfoundry...the dude went really quick on how to do "preverb". he took the first few notes of a song, copied it into annother wav, reversed & added a reverb (i think it was a gate, but this is where I got lost!) then he re-reversed and i think copied the new sound over the original....can anybody let me know if this is right. (he had a newer version of SoundForge (4.5) and I only have 4.0, so I can't get the same kind of reverbs(not to mention I think he has the directx stuff also)) |
Subject:Re: Whither Sound Forge?
Reply by: RickZ
Date:6/18/1999 7:23:00 AM
Hi Vance, Earlier this week I received an email from SonicFoundry announcing the availability for download of Vegas Pro Beta, and I took them up on it. Very nice, has 24/96 capability for recording. I'm currently using SF4.5c. I noticed that Vegas has a parameter for "Audio Editing Program", and that was automatically filled in as SF. If I have a piece of audio selected in Vegas, and hit Ctrl+E, it starts SF, and the selected clip appears in the SF window, ready to edit. My point of all this - if Vegas can record 24/96, how long can it be before the Audio Editor can edit 24/96 ? I personally prefer NOT to be bombarded with endless scheduled-for-release messages, due in Apr, no May, no June, etc . . that some companies do. Regards, Rick Z |
Subject:Re: Whither Sound Forge?
Reply by: vanceen
Date:7/2/1999 11:08:00 AM
Rick, I agree with you. Sonic Foundry does seem to be stronger on delivery than promises (although Vegas' copy protection didn't seem to be quite ready). I just hope that Sound Forge isn't orphaned in favor of Vegas, which is not a substitute. Sonic Foundry has been disturbingly silent on the point! Rick Zentmeyer wrote: >>Hi Vance, >> >>Earlier this week I received an email from SonicFoundry >>announcing the availability for download of Vegas Pro Beta, >>and I took them up on it. Very nice, has 24/96 capability >>for recording. I'm currently using SF4.5c. I noticed that >>Vegas has a parameter for "Audio Editing Program", and that >>was automatically filled in as SF. If I have a piece of >>audio selected in Vegas, and hit Ctrl+E, it starts SF, and >>the selected clip appears in the SF window, ready to edit. >> >>My point of all this - if Vegas can record 24/96, how long >>can it be before the Audio Editor can edit 24/96 ? >> >>I personally prefer NOT to be bombarded with endless >>scheduled-for-release messages, due in Apr, no May, no >>June, etc . . that some companies do. >> >>Regards, >>Rick Z |