Subject:Please, 24 bits

Posted by: ramallo

Date:4/26/1999 12:35:40 PM

I like working with my Sound Forge, but I think about the
error in the way of Sonic Foundry follow. The profesionals
sitting a Sonic Foundry and his Sound Forge in a good place
on the market, but Sonic Foundry don't remember this. The
company prefer the way of low quality internet streaming
and low quality sound files for internet, and forget the
pro market. How many time we waiting for a Sound Forge in
24 bits?, the company have plans at respect? or prefer the
amateur market?. The profesional need today a 24 bits
system (A clients request), or the profesional's is
coming to a mass desertion to other software systems.
Please, I prefer working with Sound Forge, 24 bits now!

Subject:Re: Please, 24 bits

Reply by: dafent

Date:4/26/1999 6:44:17 PM

My guess is that the 24bit soundforge is dependent on work being done for
the new multitrack, which is probably taking longer to develop than
originally planned

--
---------------------------------------------------------
David Abraham Fenton
--------------------------------------------------------
ramallo wrote in message ...
>I like working with my Sound Forge, but I think about the
>error in the way of Sonic Foundry follow. The profesionals
>sitting a Sonic Foundry and his Sound Forge in a good place
>on the market, but Sonic Foundry don't remember this. The
>company prefer the way of low quality internet streaming
>and low quality sound files for internet, and forget the
>pro market. How many time we waiting for a Sound Forge in
>24 bits?, the company have plans at respect? or prefer the
>amateur market?. The profesional need today a 24 bits
>system (A clients request), or the profesional's is
>coming to a mass desertion to other software systems.
>Please, I prefer working with Sound Forge, 24 bits now!

Subject:Re: Please, 24 bits

Reply by: vanceen

Date:5/1/1999 7:29:26 PM

Yikes, I hope not. I seem to be in the minority, but I don't care about
multi-track SF. Despite comments in this newsgroup, Cakewalk is actually a
very good program.

24 bits is another thing. Ramallo is 100% right. Let's have it!


David Abraham Fenton wrote in message ...
>My guess is that the 24bit soundforge is dependent on work being done for
>the new multitrack, which is probably taking longer to develop than
>originally planned
>
>--

Subject:Re: Please, 24 bits

Reply by: mflorio

Date:9/22/2000 11:02:00 AM

I don't care either, as I use Tascam DTRS machines for multi-
tracking. I only edit the stereo mix in Sound Forge - but can't do
it on my 20/24 - bit files.

vance erickson wrote:
>>Yikes, I hope not. I seem to be in the minority, but I don't care
about
>>multi-track SF. Despite comments in this newsgroup, Cakewalk is
actually a
>>very good program.
>>
>>24 bits is another thing. Ramallo is 100% right. Let's have it!
>>
>>
>>David Abraham Fenton wrote in message ...
>>>My guess is that the 24bit soundforge is dependent on work being
done for
>>>the new multitrack, which is probably taking longer to develop than
>>>originally planned
>>>
>>>--
>>
>>
>>