Community Forums Archive

Go Back

Subject:Just Getting Started...
Posted by: Tom_Williams
Date:4/12/1999 6:39:29 AM

Want to record my album collection onto CD for preservation.

Appears SF will do this (with optional Vinyl Restoration plug-in), but just wanted to make sure.

Will I need anything add'l to my sound card, PC and the SF software? (either required or
recommended optional components)

Will I be able to record the songs as individual entities as opposed to just recording an entire
side of an LP? I'd like to have these individually indexed/accessible on the CD like a regular
digital recording. If I can do this, is it fairly automated?

I suspect I would not get opposing views, but are there other ways to do this without SF, either
PC-based or outboard via AD converters and such? Just looking for plusses and minuses of
alternate ways of doing this without needlessly bouncing back/forth through the A/D conversion
more than once.

Thank you,

Tom

Subject:Re: Just Getting Started...
Reply by:
Date:4/12/1999 9:33:14 AM

I think CD Architect would be an important addition to your setup. It
will simplify things such as marking the separate tracks and so forth.
There may be a way to do this in SF but I never looked for it, since CD
Architect makes it so easy!

Tom_Williams wrote:
>
> Want to record my album collection onto CD for preservation.
>
> Appears SF will do this (with optional Vinyl Restoration plug-in), but just wanted to make sure.
>
> Will I need anything add'l to my sound card, PC and the SF software? (either required or
> recommended optional components)
>
> Will I be able to record the songs as individual entities as opposed to just recording an entire
> side of an LP? I'd like to have these individually indexed/accessible on the CD like a regular
> digital recording. If I can do this, is it fairly automated?
>
> I suspect I would not get opposing views, but are there other ways to do this without SF, either
> PC-based or outboard via AD converters and such? Just looking for plusses and minuses of
> alternate ways of doing this without needlessly bouncing back/forth through the A/D conversion
> more than once.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Tom

Go Back