Subject:my opinion of acid rock

Posted by: jabbajaws14

Date:6/17/1999 5:08:00 PM

im a little disappointed with acid's mixing capability to
mix multi tracks. the 8 tracks are not enough to do the
editing that is required to write a full song. what is
needed is at the least 16 tracks.

there also needs to be a built in noise reduction or
digital sampling. the signal to noise ratio is unexceptable
at the softwares current stage.

the sound samples of the rock are more like a disco reagge
style than a3 rock style. the riffs and leads samples start
points are not correct they start on the middle of the beat
rather than the begining.

drums need to be more separate beates like tom tom, bass
snare, symbol, high hat and stuff similar to that.

its a valid attempt to a new error of music creation.

Subject:Re: my opinion of acid rock

Reply by: dafent

Date:6/19/1999 4:20:00 PM

I agree. Also I don't like the one track per loop
paradigm. I think it should be possible to place different
loops on the same track, especially for drum programming.
Do I think SF will listen? Of course not, because ACID
is 'perfect'

pete wrote:
>>im a little disappointed with acid's mixing capability to
>>mix multi tracks. the 8 tracks are not enough to do the
>>editing that is required to write a full song. what is
>>needed is at the least 16 tracks.
>>
>>there also needs to be a built in noise reduction or
>>digital sampling. the signal to noise ratio is
unexceptable
>>at the softwares current stage.
>>
>>the sound samples of the rock are more like a disco
reagge
>>style than a3 rock style. the riffs and leads samples
start
>>points are not correct they start on the middle of the
beat
>>rather than the begining.
>>
>>drums need to be more separate beates like tom tom, bass
>>snare, symbol, high hat and stuff similar to that.
>>
>>its a valid attempt to a new error of music creation.
>>