Subject:Darth Vader effect
Posted by: ccliffy
Date:11/3/2005 7:58:37 AM
Is there any way to simulate ti seffect in SF? |
Subject:RE: Darth Vader effect
Reply by: jackn2mpu
Date:11/5/2005 7:16:32 AM
What specifically are you referring to? The deepness of the voice? That's James Earl Jones doing the voice, so you'd need someone with a deep voice like him. Are you asking about the breath noise? That's close miking and the gain turned up. Is it the hollow-ness of the voice? You need something to make it sound like you're talking from within a bucket or tube. That could probably be done with EQ and/or some type of bandwidth limiting. Also some echo will help. |
Subject:RE: Darth Vader effect
Reply by: RiRo
Date:11/6/2005 2:08:27 AM
Sigh... Darth Vader is poster boy for the Vocoder. The effect you are looking for is the vocoder. Analogx makes a free one that is pretty nice. |
Subject:RE: Darth Vader effect
Reply by: PumiceT
Date:11/9/2005 6:04:41 AM
Vocoder?? I'd disagree. Vocoder takes a carrier signal (usually a synth note) and controls the amplitude with a modifier signal. This is how you make robotic voices like Kraftwerk or many breakdancing songs. A more mainstream use is found in Phil Collins "In the Air Tonight" (when he says "I remembah" - that's vocoded). I suppose Darth's voice could be partially vocoded, but not 100% wet vocoder output. Like another poster said, it's really just the depth of James Earl Jones' voice, with some flange / very short delay, and a heavily compressed breathing. You could possibly try pitch shifting your own voice -2 or -3. Naturally, this is a lot easier to do with an external effects processor, as you can adjust your voice according to what you hear immediately, rather than trying to record, listen, re-record... etc. |
Subject:RE: Darth Vader effect
Reply by: rraud
Date:11/10/2005 6:50:37 PM
Yes, I agree with PumiceT, Not a Vocorder In that era, James Earl Jones' voice was likley run though an Eventide Harmoniser (among other EQs, compressors ect.) |