External Firewire Drives _ which one(s)

mfhau wrote on 2/19/2005, 1:07 AM
Ok - I like the rest of some of you, I have been using these drives for some time. I have only used Maxtor and and have only lost one out of 6 in the two years I have been using them. (and wasn't that a bastard!!!).

I have read posts about others losing external drives (and the hassles with replacement and losing data etc) and am concerned.

My question - Given these drives unfortunately fail more than IDE or SATA internal drives - what's the reliabilty across brands such as Matrox, LaCie & Seagate for an external firewire device? Is there a website showing comparisons of performance and reliability?

Comments

farss wrote on 2/19/2005, 1:42 AM
Not that I know of. Best solution we have is a firewire box that takes IDE caddies. We can then easily hook that upto the laptop, pull the drive out and plug that into the main PC for editing etc while we put another drive into the 1394 box and keep capturing. Works a treat. The box is designed for DVD and CD drives but runs upto IDE 133 no problemo.
I'd also add that the caddie has two small fans and the box has another one so things stay cool.
Best thing with this arrangement is YOU get to choose which drive you use.
Oh, we also have a 1 TB Lacie in my 'other' place. Firewire 800 and RAID 0 in the box so it screams along.
Bob.
Caruso wrote on 2/19/2005, 5:23 AM
"Given these drives unfortunately fail more than IDE or SATA internal drives"

mfhau: My experience with external firewire drives does not support your statement as a "givien". I have six external enclosures - three Maxtors - the type that are not designed to swap drives in and out of - I open these up to swap drives all the time, no problem - and three ADS enclosures.

These enclosures have been in service on my system ranging from three to four years. Once in that time, I encountered a Windows XP system error that locked me out of the data on one of the drives. In that instance, I used a utility "Get Data Back Now" to retrieve and then copy the data onto another drive before reformatting the damaged drive. That problem was a Windows problem, not any fault of the drive, itself. The drive once formatted worked fine, and is in service to this day.

The drives I use in these enclosures are all EIDE drives - no different than those installed internally in my system. Some are Maxtors, others WD. I haven't had a problem with any of them. ADS enclosures provide a fan, so, I presume the drives in those don't run as hot as anything I put in the Maxtor enclosurs - those get hot enough that you can't handle the drives with your bare hands whcn swapping them out until they have time to cool down. Nonetheless, these drives must be able to withstand that temperature, or Maxtor would not have designed the cases as they have, and my drives would have fried a long time ago.

I'm happy with, and rely daily upon all of my external firewire enclosures.

You you don't state how old the failed Maxtor was - had it seen significant service prior to being used in the enclosure - or did it fail early in your two-year use of these enclosures?

Just curious. In some 15 years of heavy computer usage, I have personally only experienced two drive failures - one was the drive in a brand new HP computer. HP help had to be convinced that I knew that about which I was speaking, but, they finally relented and sent me out a new drive on the provision that I return the oritinal to them.

The other drive was on a server at my office. It was in a system that was eight years old, had been running nonstop all that time. It finally gurgled to a stop and had to be replaced.

I'm not looking to pick a fuss with you, just sharing my opinion that we live in pretty amazing times - where, what should be very high-wear items, are designed and produced to such exacting standards that failure is extremely rare.

In my house, I bet we spend more on light bulb replacement that we do on hard drives (why can they not make a lightbulb that lasts?? I don't get it).

Thanks for the thread.
Caruso
daharvey wrote on 2/19/2005, 8:25 AM
I use an external Seagate 160gb everyday. Recently purchased a Seagate external 400gb. I have no problems capturing video to either one of them. Both drives seem to be just as fast as my internal drives. I can also move the external drives to any computer very quickly.
BillyBoy wrote on 2/19/2005, 9:37 AM
I think the problem can be traced to "bad" controller circuity either part of the external drive or on some enclosures. I had three Maxtrox "externals" one right after the other fail, the drive inside never failed and the removable drive "drawer" I use now have never failed either.
mfhau wrote on 2/20/2005, 10:35 PM
My failed Maxtor was after two years (one year warranty in Australia).
My comment was based on the odd posts I see from time to time regarding failed firewire drives and the bad time people have getting replacements or trying to get their data off. As you don't see posts concerrning internal ide or sata failures anywhere near as much.
The follwing seems to back up the argument:

http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=335545

http://mediasoftware.sonypictures.com/forums/ShowMessage.asp?ForumID=4&MessageID=342545

ans it isn't hard to find more - search on Maxtor

Anyway - I'm happy with this technology and yes agree we live in amazing times. Btw we have 6 Maxtor drives.


Caruso wrote on 2/21/2005, 3:07 AM
In the time that I've used external enclosures, I had one that simply refused to enumerate, no matter what HD I inserted into it. That was an ADS enclosure. A call to their support line got me a return authorization and ultimately led to a free replacement.

What seemed like a similar problem with one of my Maxtor enclosures resulted in the Maxtor techie telling me that the tailpiece was to blame (that would be consistent with BillyBoy's post). I went out and bought a new enclosure, but, packrat that I am, hang onto the old one.

It turned out to be a Windows XP problem that was solved with a patch - supposedly corrected in SP2. I now use both the new and the old enclosure with consistent success.

Just be certain you don't take as gospel those doomsday messages you get from XP about "write delay" failures and lost data or drives that need to be reformatted.

A reboot of the computer usually reestabilshes the connection, and I have yet to lose data, even when the drive is corrupted so as to make in inaccessible to XP.

Good luck to you.

Caruso
DCV wrote on 2/22/2005, 8:58 AM
External hard drive reliability....where do I start?

My external drives are the core of my business. Without them I would be hard pressed to do anything. This is primarily because my editing system is a 17" HP laptop. I have been burned several times due to "Delayed Write Failed" errors or when a drive has failed to enumerate. This has been across different laptops, drives, drive enclosures, cables, OS installs, and updates. To put it simply, Microsoft still has a long ways to go to make external drives as reliable as internals. Don't think for a second that they are, because they aren't. Some people have problems, some people don't. The sad part about the whole thing is everything is running along just fine and wham! Hey! Where's my drive? Why won't it come up? Scandisk says it can't complete the scan! Corrupted!?!?!?! Been there, done that, lost the projects. Get Data Back Now may or may not work. It's been 50/50 for me.

I'll also mention that it's not exclusive to Firewire or USB 2.0. They both can trash your data equally bad. I used to think it was a Firewire issue.

The best solution I've come up with is to put everything on its own bus. Don't daisy chain unless you have to. I run the hard drives on a Firewire 800 cardbus adapter, the external preview from the notebook's internal Firewire 400 interface, and the DVD burner from a USB 2.0 connection. This helps minimize problems a great deal.

John
BillyBoy wrote on 2/22/2005, 9:52 AM
I agree Microsoft has miles to go to get things right. Remember the "master" drive I mentioned in another thread that was preventing Windows to boot simply because I requested Windows to a check disk on it. Well, I thought it was past having booted it on another PC and it doing the pale blue screen "checking" the disk. Then as I said I put it back in the original system and it worked, till this morning and then Windows ws showing this drive with Delayed write errors. Again rebooting, Windows without me asking decided on its own to scan this drive again, and once it did, it seems to be running normally again. The point is I doubt anything is wrong with this drive, but Windows being Windows thinks there is, but only sometimes.
farss wrote on 2/22/2005, 10:56 AM
I've found a LOT of the issues were related to the Enable LBA flag. Get this thing wrong and drives appear to work just fine for a while. I suspect when the LBA goes past the limit is when you start to get problems.
From my limited understanding of the issue some drives / controllers handle this issue internally but also Windoz will have a go as well and things can get very muddied plus I think something in the BIOS gets into the act. After a fair bit of experimenting all 1394 drives work fine, I can pull them out of the 1394 enclosures and plug them into the main beast without issue but before that it was hell. We'd get so many hours of capturing and then hit a Delayed Write Error.
Bob.
ken c wrote on 2/23/2005, 4:18 AM
so, what's the easiest way to make backups of external drives: write to a bunch of DVDs, or just buy more external drives and keep those as backups?

ken
farss wrote on 2/23/2005, 4:36 AM
I think your last idea is the best one. DVDs work out at 20c per GB, HDs at $1 / GB but you get to re use HD a lot of times and they're way faster to write to. I always find any seemingly unnecesary procedure that's time consuming always gets avoided, more so when you're under pressure which is when you're most likely to have something go pear shaped anyway.
If business gets any better I'm going to look at a big RAID 5 NAS unit to store things on.
Bob.