Subject:cakewalk plasma 2003
Posted by: vicorex
Date:8/30/2002 8:37:47 AM
Hello! I've seen Cakewalk released another loop-based software called Plasma. Did anyone try it ? Is it better than ACID or not ? |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: Spirit
Date:8/30/2002 8:44:01 AM
Does this screen shot remind you of anything ? http://www.cakewalk.com/images/Plasma/Collage_big.gif |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: vicorex
Date:8/30/2002 8:52:12 AM
of course :) but still it can be better than ACID. that's what i would like to know. |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: buffalosnout
Date:8/30/2002 9:02:52 AM
I got a copy of Plasma and have since uninstalled it from my computer. For the money ($19), it was an excellent value, but for my needs, it was too "lightweight" to get anything done. |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: Rockitglider
Date:8/30/2002 11:39:55 AM
Hello, I tried it, It's OK but it doesn't stack up to Acid Pro at all. See ya, Rockitglider |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: MyST
Date:8/30/2002 11:53:40 AM
Here's a hint that it doesn't stack up against Acid Pro. Cakewalk keeps comparing Acid Pro to Sonar, NOT Plasma. M |
Subject:RE: cakewalk plasma 2003
Reply by: anon
Date:8/30/2002 2:05:07 PM
HaHa, Actually, I just checked out Plasma on cakewalk's site and it screams "Better than Acid!". But you look at the comparison chart it's compared to Acid Music 3. Cakewalk has been ruthless pulling out the aggresive Mac style ads. |