Sorry, this is going to be a long one. Please stick with me if you can.....
While I play a Video Professional at work (and on TV), at home my most recent video footage was limited to a webcam. A very nice webcam (a Logitech 9000) but not even close to professional grade. A lot of what I do for fun at home is green screen/chroma key work. One whole side of my office/studio is covered with a green screen that drapes across the floor. A good lighting setup too.
Anyway, I just purchased a "prosumer" HD AVCHD video camera (JVC Everio) and it outputs files in .mts format (1920x1080), which Sony Vegas Pro gladly accepts. The images are crisp, clear and very professional looking. The raw files look great when I view them in Windows Media or Nero Kwik Viewer. Not so great in Quick Time.
Now here's where my problem and lack of knowledge comes in. After I make my little chroma key production (I just purchased Boris FX Chroma Key, which is much better than my previous favorite NewBlue Fx Chroma Key), I'm ready to render. Now I understand about interlacing and how it was needed for cathode ray tubes, but you need to de-interlace for HD or computer monitors. What I'm not sure about is the best format to render in, the best Codec to use and the best viewer to view the finished product in.
I've gone through several experiments and configurations and codecs. I recently downloaded CoreAVC (claiming to be the best codec to use), prior to that I've tried Cedocida DV codec. You may ask, why don't I just use the Codecs that come with Windows or the software I'm using???
Well, when rendering in Vegas Pro 11, several of the output files I've tried came out unreadable (black or very distorted/pixelated). Some files had very noticeable interlacing. Thus the reason for trying different things. I've tried rendering to AVI, mp4, m2t, each with varying results.
I don't know where the CoreAVC codec comes in, I think it might just play with Windows Media Player, because I noticed a change in that. Better de-interlacing.
Well, I know I've rambled on long enough, hopefully I've given you an idea as to what I'm looking for, probably for some of you it's very basic, but it's giving me a real big headache. Any suggestions, tips, advice, tutorials, criticisms or off-color jokes would be appreciated.
Basically what (in your opinion) is the best looking combination of rendering output, files, codec, viewers, etc. will give me the best results when starting off with mts files from my camera?
Thank you!
Lee
While I play a Video Professional at work (and on TV), at home my most recent video footage was limited to a webcam. A very nice webcam (a Logitech 9000) but not even close to professional grade. A lot of what I do for fun at home is green screen/chroma key work. One whole side of my office/studio is covered with a green screen that drapes across the floor. A good lighting setup too.
Anyway, I just purchased a "prosumer" HD AVCHD video camera (JVC Everio) and it outputs files in .mts format (1920x1080), which Sony Vegas Pro gladly accepts. The images are crisp, clear and very professional looking. The raw files look great when I view them in Windows Media or Nero Kwik Viewer. Not so great in Quick Time.
Now here's where my problem and lack of knowledge comes in. After I make my little chroma key production (I just purchased Boris FX Chroma Key, which is much better than my previous favorite NewBlue Fx Chroma Key), I'm ready to render. Now I understand about interlacing and how it was needed for cathode ray tubes, but you need to de-interlace for HD or computer monitors. What I'm not sure about is the best format to render in, the best Codec to use and the best viewer to view the finished product in.
I've gone through several experiments and configurations and codecs. I recently downloaded CoreAVC (claiming to be the best codec to use), prior to that I've tried Cedocida DV codec. You may ask, why don't I just use the Codecs that come with Windows or the software I'm using???
Well, when rendering in Vegas Pro 11, several of the output files I've tried came out unreadable (black or very distorted/pixelated). Some files had very noticeable interlacing. Thus the reason for trying different things. I've tried rendering to AVI, mp4, m2t, each with varying results.
I don't know where the CoreAVC codec comes in, I think it might just play with Windows Media Player, because I noticed a change in that. Better de-interlacing.
Well, I know I've rambled on long enough, hopefully I've given you an idea as to what I'm looking for, probably for some of you it's very basic, but it's giving me a real big headache. Any suggestions, tips, advice, tutorials, criticisms or off-color jokes would be appreciated.
Basically what (in your opinion) is the best looking combination of rendering output, files, codec, viewers, etc. will give me the best results when starting off with mts files from my camera?
Thank you!
Lee