Comments

Jay Gladwell wrote on 2/3/2005, 8:17 AM
Cool!

Jay
Spot|DSE wrote on 2/3/2005, 8:30 AM
Very nice! But did you see the creative time/render time?! YIKES!

Time required to capture component images: 1 hour and 12 minutes
Time required to match overlapping images: 20 hours
Time required to optimise project: 4 hours
Time required to compose the image: 3 full days using 5 high-end pcs
Time required to blend seams / correct misalignments / finalise image: 2 days
rique wrote on 2/3/2005, 11:04 AM
That is amazing. You can zoom in and read the license plate numbers on the cars perfectly. Big Brother lives.
epirb wrote on 2/3/2005, 3:52 PM
Yeah , I noticed on the Volvo wagon, the detailers left a 2inch Spot of wax on the front fender, and the right rear tire looks 5psi too low ; ).
Actually what struck me is the barrel distortion, if you look at those cars there Squooshed!
stepfour wrote on 2/3/2005, 8:36 PM
Now that's a big picture! I also noticed the cars look distorted. Also, if you look along the streets on the right side, you'll find some half-people (upper, or lower half missing). Looks very strange. The makers must have had trouble stitching area's with a lot of detail.
boomhower wrote on 2/3/2005, 9:04 PM
"Also, if you look along the streets on the right side, you'll find some half-people (upper, or lower half missing). Looks very strange"

ZOMBIES!!!!!
farss wrote on 2/3/2005, 11:39 PM
This has been done before with the Grand Canyon, very impressive result.
Bob.
AlanC wrote on 2/4/2005, 1:12 AM
Apologies,

I seem to have 2 threads going on this subject. We lost our Broadband network just at the time I made the first post. It didn't come back until 18:30 GMT so things got a bit screwed up.

Sorry
AlanC wrote on 2/4/2005, 1:49 AM
Just out of curiosity I imported the bmp into Vegas. You can create quite a good simulation of a helicopter flight around the town. (Just need an authentic chopper sound now)
stormstereo wrote on 2/4/2005, 2:58 AM
I've found a window in the distant with a naked coulpe. That'll keep you busy for a while. :)

Best/Tommy
epirb wrote on 2/4/2005, 4:16 AM
I found em!
But they are 80 yrs old!
(there's good resolution naked and bad resolution naked) ;o )
ScottW wrote on 2/4/2005, 5:56 AM
They explain some of the artifacts (such as a half-person) on the web site - it's a result of the long exposure time for the photo (1.5 hours).
AlanC wrote on 2/4/2005, 6:30 AM
ScottW

Yes, but what do they say about the 80 year old naked couple?
stormstereo wrote on 2/19/2005, 1:11 PM
Now that's my kind of humour. I love this forum!
Best/T
Cheno wrote on 2/19/2005, 1:32 PM
Now you never know who's watching.. guess I need to start wearing clean underwear and to quit picking my nose... hate to have that end up on someone's website.
rique wrote on 2/19/2005, 1:57 PM
Yes, but what do they say about the 80 year old naked couple?

They were only 60 when the exposure started.
theforce wrote on 2/19/2005, 5:25 PM
Can you tell what time the pic was taken?
rique wrote on 2/19/2005, 7:32 PM
Can you tell what time the pic was taken?

There are two clocks visible, showing 3:05 and 3:15, which would be somewhere within the hour and 12 minutes it took to capture all the images contained in the panorama.

image features
AlanC wrote on 2/21/2005, 2:01 AM
I hope that isn't one of the forum members

http://www.tpd.tno.nl/smartsite1061.html