Comments

Jay Gladwell wrote on 2/4/2005, 5:07 AM
Beautifully done!

Jay

P.S. Would you please contact me? jayATgooddogproductionsDOTcom
B_JM wrote on 2/4/2005, 5:55 AM
very nice, looks great ...


I like the fishing rod in there ..
GmElliott wrote on 2/4/2005, 5:59 AM
Yeah I left that in because there was a guy fishing when the bridal party arrive for photos. The groom is an avid fisher so he asked the guy to pose with the rod for a few shots.
B_JM wrote on 2/4/2005, 6:12 AM
well thats certainly better than my cousin years ago - who during the wedding reception at his parents house on a lake -- during the reception, grabbed his shotgun along with his brother when a flock of geese landed, and in his tux went goose hunting down on the shore .....

people in my family didnt think it was so unusual for them - but some in the brides family thought it was more than a little strange ...
Red96TA wrote on 2/4/2005, 9:20 AM
The footage you have has a great soft almost glow to it. What effects are you applying to your clips?
Skywatcher wrote on 2/4/2005, 9:42 AM
Just about anyone can learn how to operate Cameras, equipment and even Sony Vegas...but the creativity; Man! Thats God given!

GREAT WORK...truly the best I've seen

Skywatcher
Coursedesign wrote on 2/4/2005, 10:34 AM
Beautifully done. You really communicated the happiness of the people there.

I loved the shot of the toddler on a shoulder also, great!
GmElliott wrote on 2/4/2005, 1:35 PM
For this piece is was only 3 filters. Levels, Color Corrector, and Glow.
How to combine these 3 is a much more difficult explanation.
Luxo wrote on 2/4/2005, 1:42 PM
Extremely well done, from one wedding videographer to another. I'd also like to know the treatement you gave the footage. Looks like a soft ellypical mask to darken the edges, in addition to contrast and glow adjustments.
GmElliott wrote on 2/4/2005, 5:56 PM
Yes it was an eliptical gradient (black to transparent). Thank you.
GmElliott wrote on 2/4/2005, 8:15 PM
Thank you for the kind words- very flattering.
xjerx wrote on 2/5/2005, 12:24 AM
Beautiful work. What cameras do you use? Just curious.
Stonefield wrote on 2/5/2005, 1:15 AM
....yeah it was ok.
Stonefield wrote on 2/5/2005, 1:16 AM
.....heh....gotcha....

(smile)
VMP wrote on 2/5/2005, 4:12 AM
Nice picture treatment and camera moves, good job.
Did you also compose the music yourself?
GmElliott wrote on 2/5/2005, 7:05 AM
Sony PD-170, VX2100, and Panasonic DVC-80 (assistant's)
MarkFoley wrote on 2/5/2005, 7:14 AM
what? not done in HDV? :-)
Fleshpainter wrote on 2/5/2005, 3:05 PM
Once again I've been inspired by a GmElliott masterpiece.
Stonefield wrote on 2/6/2005, 1:37 AM
I'm really looking forward to seeing your skill at other types of videos as well as wedding videos. Can't wait to see.
GmElliott wrote on 2/6/2005, 1:30 PM
what? not done in HDV? :-)

lol
GmElliott wrote on 2/6/2005, 1:36 PM
..well, I actually purchased my first dv cam about 5 years ago (TRV-17) with aspirations on doing shorts, and even maybe a horror feature. Needless to say I had no intentions to become a "wedding videographer". I did one as a wedding gift for a collegue which was well recieved. I soon got calls asking about my "rates" and "options", etc. I was excited at the chance to do something I have a great passion for and actually make money doing so. My documentary which was more ambitious than any wedding project to date (9 months in post production) actually caused me to "lose" money. I didn't even break even!

I have, however, grown to really see the art in this genre. I don't believe everyone does..but that's an advantage for me because there are so many professional videographers out there that still take a very straight-forward uninspired approach.
mvpvideos2007 wrote on 2/6/2005, 7:30 PM
GM, very nice work. Very clean, smooth and professional looking. Images are well framed and looks great!!!!
slacy wrote on 2/7/2005, 12:13 AM
Agreed, beautiful work. Your tracking shots are so smooth. Did you use a dolly on any of them?

I also noticed some subtle rotation in a few of the shots. Did you use the leftover area from the 16:9 crop to rotate the frame just slightly? If so, a very ingenius use of lost pixels....
GmElliott wrote on 2/7/2005, 9:33 AM
Every shot is handheld, no stabilizer used.

You picked up on some of the twists, good eye. That's a techique I've been working on when cropping my footage I'll animate a subtle pan crop to give the shot a more kinetic look. You just have to know the boundaries of the pan/crop tool and it's affect on resolution through interpolation.